Apartment Therapy Unplggd Ohdeedoh Re-Nest The Kitchn

ChgoRunr's Profile

Display Name: ChgoRunr
Member Since: 3/30/07
Are all of these comments spam? For non-spam comments, please email us at help@apartmenttherapy.com

Latest Comments...

I like this small space a lot. Great use of white marble. Since it is obvious money was not much of a constraint, I wish a modern wall system would have been incorporated on the wall opposite the sofa. As it is now, the TV and 4 bars stools give this place a college dorm look (albeit on the high-end). Plus, de-clutter all that stuff on the shelves above the stove. Less is more, as Mies said. Plus, I cannot date or trust a man who does not have at least a few shelves of books around. IMHO, one who is well read is more likley to be very attentive and hot in bed. So, run to B&B Italia and get that wall system pronto!


Apartment Therapy New York | House Tour: Ed's High Speed, High End, Landmark New York
7/23/08 4:06 PM

I like it a lot. Very creative and different solution. I have no industrial/ welding background, so the color works for me, too.


Apartment Therapy Los Angeles | Look! Orange Welding Curtain
7/22/08 8:22 AM

I agree with you, JYW, $1620 (plus parking) for studio is definitely a bit insane. BUT, I can I walk to the Loop for work (no Red or Blue Line construction delays to deal with and ruin my day). Streeterville is mighty convenient to Michigan Ave. shopping, restaurants, and my gym. I do think $600 is do-able in Chicago. However, some EL stops should be condemned for their filth and smell. Plus, some city neighborhoods, while less expensive, are too gang-friendly. IMHO, the major trade-off is safety and convenience (and several hundred dollars more, unfortunately). I am fortunate I can live where I live, but it is a bit pricey. Different strokes for different folks, as they say. :-)


Apartment Therapy Chicago | CHI Good Questions: Interesting Apartment for $600?#comments#comments
7/22/08 8:07 AM

REALITY CHECK: While $600 for a studio in Chicago is certainly do-able, I would like all out-of-towners to know that $600 is NOT within walking distance of the central business district (i.e., the Loop). More like 7 – 8 miles north, or anywhere from 4 – 8 miles west of the city... in mixed-income neighborhoods (which may or may not be a dumpy neighborhood).

Just be mindful that not all EL train stops are created equal or are equally safe. Ditto for a walk to the grocery store.

My 585 sq. ft. studio in Steeterville (2 miles from the Loop) is $1620/month, plus $250 a month for parking. Granted it’s a new building and within a 25-30 minute walk to the Loop, but I don’t think this is cheap. Maybe for New York, D.C., or San Francisco, but not to me here in the Midwest.


Apartment Therapy Chicago | CHI Good Questions: Interesting Apartment for $600?#comments
7/21/08 9:01 AM

Sorry, Patrick(the other one), but it MIGHT be possible for the estate of Aalto to sue on the basis of reverse engineering (jsut one argument off the top of my head). Intellectual property law is not my forte; an IP attorney would know for certain.

IMHO, T.Wong does not possess true artitic talent other than being clever. He reminds me of that other fraud and rip-off "artist" Mark Kostabi. Yes, I know, Kostabi made major bucks ripping off other artists. He's still a total LOSER for stealing real artists work.

BTW: Reverse engineering is the process of discovering the technological principles of a device, object or system through analysis of its structure, function and operation. It often involves taking something (e.g. a mechanical device, electronic component, or software program) apart and analyzing its workings in detail, usually to try to make a new device or program that does the same thing without copying anything from the original.


Apartment Therapy New York | Hot or Not? Aalto Doorstop by Tobias Wong
4/23/08 3:56 PM

THIS DESIGN FAILS miserably at the intended function of the room. It shows some creative talent, but filling a room with over-priced furniture, etc. does not make for good design, nor does it follow within the parameters of the stated purpose of the room.

A great designer is able to take in to account what the intended function of the room is all about; interpret that function; and then simultaneously inject that function with great design.

Levine's “design” does not do that; it only focuses on the superficial not the substantive reason for the existence of the room itself. Typical of Levine work.

I wholeheartedly agree with everything “CMSchmidt,” “Nattles,” and “ManofSteel” stated.

If I were the client and I was presented with a rendering of a den-like setting, I would move on to the next “designer.” It is evident from this room that Levine obviously is not capable of thinking about good design from the [paying] client’s perspective, but only his own narcissistic viewpoint.

Not to mention, it is clear LEVINE IS ONLY A MERE INTERIOR DECORATOR who obviously has never worked in a real office setting.

A great designer listens to his client, then interprets the client’s needs through great design. For a designer to interject his/ her own personal taste onto a client--- a sad trademark of Levine’s--- is POOR DESIGN (and not even good design).

In short, this is NOT an office. In my humble opinion, Levine get a grade of F… and his “show has been cancelled.”

BTW: I once, unfortunately, was acquainted with Doug Levine through a mutual friend. He’s a total prig and irritatingly arrogant (for no discernable reason other than he’s a complete narcissist). This “office” “design” is so typical of Doug. He can only think from his narcissistic perspective of what good design is all about (lots of tacky gold accents and "bling bling").

Levine has always thought that because a client spends $20,000 on one of his sofas or $10,000 on a side table that the client has good taste (and that IS about what he cahrges, too).

The price of things should have virtually nothing to do with great design. Sorry, Levine, you missed that class at Harrington’s Interior Decorating School.

What’s more, Levine’s “designs” are only semi-creative RE-interpretations of PRE-EXISTING designs. Basically, anyone with a modicum of good taste can do what he does. Levine plagiarizes others’ designs all the time--- HE IS NOT ORIGINAL at all.

Holly Hunt was right to give him the boot.


Apartment Therapy - Dream Home: Design Report - The Home Office by Douglas Levine
9/22/07 10:46 AM

I love Calatrava's Milwaukee Museum of Art, along with more than one of his bridges in Europe (especailly the Alamillo Bridge in Seville). However, I HATE the now neuterd spire-less Chicago Spire.

I love one block west of the proposed grossly over-scaled edifice to Calatrava's already (self)inflated ego. SO, I can speak to how this building poses many problems to an already poorly conceived, designed, and over-developed Streeterville neighborhood. FOr exmaple, it will literally and figuratively over-shadow and dominate its immediate surroundings. Imagine blopping down a building TALLER than the Sears Tower one block from your home (and add 2600 cars---2 for each unit).

Whether you agree or not, Streeterville is a neighborhood. Sadly, this nieghborhood is rapidly becoming canyonized or Manhattanized with some very ugly cheap-looking and cheaply executed buildings (I refrain from saying architecture, becuase they are not; they are just ugly buildings). Sadder still, these ugly buildings---and the neutered spire-less Chciago "Spire" is among them---will have an adverse effect on our skyline for generations.

I am NOT against high-rises or skyscrapers, increased development or modern architecture (in Streeterville or anywhere else), but I am against BAD ARCHITECTURE and BAD DESIGN. Calatrava's neuterd spire-less Chicago "Spire" is both; and it is the wrong building for this specific small (2.2 acre) plot of land.


Hot or Not?
4/3/07 1:31 PM

I love GusModern stuff... wish I could have been there, but I'm in Chicago. Especially bummed I didn't to see in person the handsome chap in the brown suede jacket pictured here. He's VERY cute! :-)


AT Design Drinksfest Tonight... Thanks for Coming Out!
3/30/07 8:37 AM